Monday, October 20, 2008

Nobel Prize Winners vs. Shuttle Driver

The £780,000 Nobel Prize winners... and the £4.25 an hour driver whose jellyfish find paved the way for their triumph

By Sharon Churcher
Last updated at 1:00 AM on 19th October 2008

* Comments (14)
* Add to My Stories


As the scientist behind the revolutionary research that won this year’s Nobel Prize for chemistry, you might expect to find Douglas Prasher working in the laboratories of one of the world’s most prestigious universities.

But while three other researchers shared the coveted £780,000 award for work based on his discovery, Dr Prasher is earning just £4.25 an hour driving a courtesy shuttle for customers of an Alabama car dealership.

Dr Prasher had to give up his research after running out of money but, last night, he insisted he was not bitter about losing out on the award – although he did suggest the winners might like to share some of their windfall with him.
Douglas Prasher



In debt: Douglas Prasher with the shuttle car he now drives for a living, despite his pioneering work with the Aequorea jellyfish to track diseases

In 1992, Dr Prasher isolated a gene that makes jellyfish glow in the dark – a discovery he rightly predicted could be used to study diseases including cancer, AIDS and Alzheimer’s.

But when he ran out of funds, he handed over his work to Martin Chalfie and Roger Tsien, who this month shared the Nobel award with Osamu Shimomura, who conducted earlier research in the same field.

Professors Chalfie and Tsien, from New York’s Columbia University and the University of California respectively, acknowledged that they could not have won the prize without Dr Prasher’s work.

Labels:

Wednesday, September 24, 2008

$10 Million Idea



(CNN) -- Got an idea that could change the world, or at least help a lot of people? Google wants to hear from you -- and it will pay as much as $10 million to make your idea a reality.

Called Project 10^100 (pronounced "10 to the 100th"), Google's initiative will seek input from the public and a panel of judges in choosing up to five winning ideas, to be announced in February.

Google announced the project live on CNN on Wednesday morning.

"These ideas can be big or small, technology-driven or brilliantly simple -- but they need to have impact," Google said in a news release. "We know there are countless brilliant ideas that need funding and support to come to fruition."

Those are ideas such as the Hippo Water Roller, which Google cited as the kind of concept the company would be interested in rewarding. Developed in Africa, where it is most used, the Hippo Water Roller is a barrel-shaped container, attached to a handle, that holds 24 gallons of water and can be rolled with little effort like a wheelbarrow, making it easier for villagers on foot to transport critically needed fresh water to their homes.

People are encouraged to submit their ideas, in any of 25 languages, at www.project10tothe100.com through October 20. Entrants must briefly describe their idea and answer six questions, including, "If your idea were to become a reality, who would benefit the most and how?"

Google employees, with the help of an advisory board, will narrow the submissions to 100 semifinalists by January 27. Between January 27 and February 2, the public will vote online for their favorite ideas. A panel of as-yet-unnamed judges will then review the top 20 ideas and announce up to five winners in mid-February.

Funding, from a pool of $10 million, will be awarded in May. If the judges decide to reward five winning ideas, each will receive $2 million. If only two ideas are chosen, each will receive $5 million, and so on.

A Google spokeswoman was reluctant to set parameters for the submissions, although the project's Web site suggests that successful ideas should address such issues as providing food and shelter, building communities, improving health, granting more access to education, sustaining the global ecosystem and promoting clean energy.

"We don't want to limit it at all. We want a wide range of ideas," said Bethany Poole, product marketing manager at Google, who announced the project Wednesday on CNN along with Andy Berndt, managing director of Google's Creative Lab. "We think great ideas come from anywhere."

To cite Google's own example, Google News began after the September 11 terrorist attacks, when an engineer became frustrated that he couldn't aggregate news sources from around the world in one place.

By opening the project to anyone -- not just laboratories or universities -- Google is embracing "crowdsourcing," the Internet-age notion that the collective wisdom of mass audiences can be leveraged to find solutions to design tasks.

Project 10^100 is not unlike the Google-sponsored Lunar X PRIZE, a $30 million international competition to safely land a robot on the surface of the moon, travel 500 meters over the lunar surface, and send images and data back to Earth. The first team to land on the moon and complete the mission objectives will be awarded $20 million. At least 16 teams are competing.

Those who submit winning Project 10^100 ideas will not be required to have the technical expertise to implement them, Poole said. Google has not determined how winning projects will be sustained financially after the initial prize money runs out, she said.

People may submit more than one idea. Through its online submissions, Google also hopes to connect people with good ideas to charitable organizations who could help implement them, Poole said.

Labels: ,

Saturday, September 20, 2008

One Dollar House

Look at this....



$1
10 Bed, 7 Bath
9,025 Sq. Ft.
1.2 Acres
Estimated Payment:
$0 Per Month*
Change Assumptions
Check Local Mortgage Rates
2900 Fairmount (AUCTION)
Cleveland Heights, OH 44118
MLS ID# 2488204


Send to a REALTOR®
Send to a Friend
Save this Listing

Does the real estate touch the bottom already ? There are so many $1 properties on sale...

Labels: ,

Wednesday, September 03, 2008

Double Standards

There are definite double standards when it comes to women and politics. The new GOP VP choice --- Sarah Palin, is under broad question of her capabilities to balance five children family life and her VP role.

However, nobody ever raises the question about John McCain-- who has 7 children all together.

Isn't this some sort of double standards?

Labels: ,

Tuesday, July 15, 2008

What is next?

Bank of IndyMac collapsed. The second largest morgage bank. Which bank will be the next? Washington Mutual?

Feels like we are at the beginning of the Great Depression.

Labels: ,

Friday, February 01, 2008

论女权

这个题目有些大, 我想我是没有时间来具体长篇大论的。只是想说一些感想。

女权运动在西方曾经轰轰烈烈,现在美国很多保护妇女的法律比如不许性别歧视,同工同酬,兼顾工作和生育的权利等等, 都是争取的结果。加州还有很多州内法保护的更好一些。虽然很多职业女性仍有看不见的玻璃天花板, 但比起一两百年以前, 已是好得多了。不过,不平等还是根深蒂固的, 这次 Hillary Clinton 总统竞选, 就有人公开举标语牌说:"Iron my shirt!" 象这么愚昧的从骨子里不尊重女性的人, 并不在少数。

女权运动最大的障碍, 其实并不在于男人,而是女人自己。
还是拿这次总统竞选来说, 很多家庭妇女对于 Hillary 就觉得不可理解---怎么可能又照顾好家, 又在外面服务于社会呢?这个女人对家庭没责任心嘛!我不选她!--在 New Hampshire 向 Hillary 提问并让之哭泣以对 ( 好著名的一哭!)的那位女士最终将票投给了 Obama.不过,Hillary 这一哭确是感动了好多职业妇女并使她赢得了 New Hampshire 的决定性初选.

现在再说说东方女权状况吧。也许是文化和重视男性的社会哲学方面的原因吧,东方可以说是没有女权!日本和韩国的男权特征是众所周知的: 韩国70% 的家庭有家暴,女人上不了家庭宴席, 女儿回娘家必须夫家首肯;日本据说女职员女教授要给同等地位的男同事男教授端茶倒水打扫卫生的。--真是恐怖!

中国相对要好些吧。毛泽东是个很重视女权的人,"妇女半边天"就是他老人家提出来的, 这可能与他对母亲的尊重和怀念很有关系。不过, 觉得近些年国内女权反而退步了。男人变相纳妾( "二奶"),很多女人为了家庭的完整而忍辱负重。很多城市的职业女性经济上独立了, 但精神感情上仍依赖男人, 没有自己的主见,或者非得追寻什么"爱情"--文化上中了琼瑶的毒了。在法律上, 离了婚的女人受的保护很少, 包括她的孩子。还有工作场合甚至招工的时候, 性别歧视是公开的。很多职场女性不敢怀孕, 怕因此丢了工作。

看来中国女权, 首先要争取的是生育的权利, 废除计划生育的愚蠢政策。然后需要立法保护各项相关权益。这些事情, 不在男人, 女人自己的警醒是最重要的。"女权"不是做悍妇拿着棒子追打男人, 而是个体相对的经济与精神独立。

Labels: ,

Friday, October 12, 2007

温水煮青蛙

社会的变化就和"温水煮青蛙"一样, 温度是慢慢增加的。在一个地方久了, 很不容易意识到这种不知不觉的缓缓的蜕变, 等知道时, 已经是来不及逃不掉了。

Labels: ,

Wednesday, October 03, 2007

谏逐客书?

最近去一些公共场所,如公园,动物园和水族馆, 已经很少见到墨西哥人了, 据说加强国土安防和限制雇主雇佣非法移民之后, 很多墨人都躲起来了, 还有很多非法墨人被遣送回境,很多墨西哥人聚集的地方被突袭, 查找偷渡客. 另外, 还有一些小镇开始立法,租房必须要有合法的居住文件,非法移民很难安身下来了.

有国情咨文列举事实,讲美国很有些罗马帝国衰落前的征兆,包括开始拒绝接纳移民和经济衰退。

非法移民是有错的. 但现在美元下滑,房市危机,美国需要便宜劳动力和便宜货物来阻止通货膨胀,也需要移民租房买房来抬高房市, 更需要高科技移民来提高国家的劳动生产力, 稳住美元。现在大肆立法逐客,限制合法移民,不知议员们都怎么想的?

Labels: ,

Saturday, June 09, 2007

The Evolution and the Global Warming

Two things caught my mind in current political arena, rather bizarrely I may add, are evolution theory and the global warming. The reason I feel funny is that I always assumed these two issues should only be discussed by sound scientists instead of egregiously misinformed politicians. Man! I am wrong.

Three of the ten Republican presidential candidates, one senator, one governor, and one congressman, raised their hands during the presidential debate when asked by the host “WHO DON’T BELIEVE THE EVOLUITON ?”. Astonishing, isn’t it? Wait, there is more.

It turns out, when I googled it lately, only 9% American people actually believe humans evolved without God’s being involved according to CBS news/NY times poll conducted in November 2004. Among those 93% people who believed in God’s involvement, 55% of them believed the Bible literally, which means God created the earth in six days about 6000 years ago.

Scientific community, however, initiates countless efforts to educate the public.
The result, obviously seen from this poll, is not pleasant. The deep down reason, I figure, is that people want a simple answer for a very complicated inquiry. Creation is a simple answer, therefore, it prevails. Even thought evolution may win this battle some day, religion could still hold the final fortress in the mind of the mass majority. Yes, because it will provide simple answer anywhere, anytime for the unlimited curiosity of human being.

Another red hot topic is the man-made global warming phenomenon, which came from, of course, the other end of political spectrum. I have to admit the global warming hurts me deeply by just looking at my utilities bills of last summer. However, the “man-made” part really got me confused. Are we human powerful enough that we can actually change the earth climate by changing daily activities? Ice age started melting down millions of years ago, long before the very existence of the human being. I doubt turning off my car will stop this trend.

Ok. Let’s put the creationists and the advocators of the global warming together and think about their philosophy root. My discovery may offend both groups immediately: I think they are, believe it or not, sharing the same ideology---that is, the human entitles unique status in the universe and bears the full responsibility for whatever happened on the Earth. Bible is filled with such stories that mankind got harsh punishment from the Almighty by committing some eerie behavior.

According to the dominated view of the most Hollywood celebrities--- they were never wrong about scientific research---- the global warming is inevitable. My suggestion is to give the evolution some faith instead of to push us back to the primitive society.

---hedou

Labels: ,

Sunday, June 03, 2007

Enviromentalism by Convenience

刚才看CNN专题报道,讲能源危机及一些的新能源产品, 比如现在的 Hybrid car, Ethanol from corn plants or sugar canes, 还有很多汽车公司正在研究的 Hydrogen car, etc.觉得这些新产品还不太能够普及的原因是成本太高,相比起来gas 作为能源还是便宜很多。 例如买 Hybrid Car 凭空要贵出好多,怎么省油省税都回不来的。

我是支持环保的, 但环保 need by Convenience, not by Commitment, 才是赢得大众最终方法。

Labels:

Monday, May 07, 2007

自由的幸福

幸福的感觉, 来源于对时间的自由支配。放假了高兴,因为我们可以自由地玩几天了。 监狱照样有吃有喝有睡, 为什么没人想进? 因为没有自由。工作有时让人烦, 是因为人必需在那些特定的时间干些特定的事情。

最好时时惊喜, 时时有不被预料的事情发生。人生若可预定, 做总统也索然无味。

社会最可贵的也是自由,自由迁徙, 自由生小孩,自由来来去去。界定越多的社会人的幸福感也越淡。

若能总是" 率性而发", 该有多好!

Labels:

The Lost Generation

这本书讲的是一批十九世纪末二十世纪初从美国回到英国的人群的心态。 在他们回去的时候, 英国是最强盛的, 但经过两次世界大战之后, 美国很快地繁荣了起来而英国却日渐衰落, 他们这一群千辛万苦回到英国的人,失落感是很大的。

就好象, 我们这一群流落海外的人。中国的经济腾飞大潮, 我们似乎是已经无可奈何的错过了。 面对美国日趋保守的社会风气,和国内越来越自由的社会形态, 至少,我内心里是觉得些许失落的。

失落并不是后悔,就比如"羊子歧路",选择了一条路, 必然会错过另一条路上的风景。 至于哪条路上会有"羊", 就是运气的问题了.

Labels: ,

Tuesday, April 24, 2007

Honey Bee 的消失



New! ---MSNBC 的新闻连接

前两天看 CNN 新闻,科学版的, 讲从去年年底开始,美国以及欧州的 Honey Bee 减少了将近一半。由于媒体铺天盖地的报道Virginia Tech 的枪击案, 这条新闻估计没引起多少人注意。

其实,就真实的影响来讲, 这条新闻重要得多。Honey Bee 在食物链里是很重要的一环,很多谷类,水果都靠Honey Bee 授粉结子。Honey Bee 大规模的减少会引起饥荒,至少会让很多养鸡场的家禽食物短缺, 连带的会影响经济,以及对人类的食物供应。

Honey Bee 为什么会减少这么快? A Total Mystery. 而人类对这方面的研究及相应对策根本没有,一旦 Break Out 恐怕会措手不及。

蜜蜂是靠生物磁场来导航的。,所以有猜测讲可能是空气中的各种无线电信号手机信号太多导致蜜蜂迷失。 我们无所顾忌的消费着大自然 (譬如用手机 Twitter之类 ),人类的消亡,可能会比我们预测的早得多。

Labels:

FREE hit counter and Internet traffic statistics from freestats.com